I am a very private person. I won’t tell the cashier at the sports equipment store my phone number. I am not interested in reading the details of people’s daily routines that make up so many blogs. I don’t understand the need to put revealing photographs on public websites. I don’t like to talk about myself, even to friends. So I am completely out of touch with the contemporary Facebook ethos.
Headlines have been made
recently by young people who have put obviously incriminating information
online for anyone to see. Using Facebook, an Oklahoma
mother tried to sell her two babies, so she could bail out her boyfriend,
and a Tennessee
teacher demanded sex from a student. When a group of teenagers attacked
another teen in Chicago last year, punching, kicking and then robbing him, they
filmed themselves and posted the video on YouTube. Soon they were arrested.
But these stories of inept
criminals are not typical usages of social media. Despite the worries of
parents, most teens
are careful about what they post on Facebook, and use privacy settings and
other means to manage their online reputations. What has changed, to the
discomfort of many adults, is the definition of the community in which modern
teens, and others, live and share.
Privacy and community are
intertwined. We are not disturbed by people within a certain community keeping
in contact, knowing about our lives and telling us about themselves. Modern
technological culture has already greatly expanded traditional definitions of
our communities of privacy. What used to be kept within the family is now known
more widely, as we interact with more people over greater distances. The
telephone and the automobile have expanded community over the past century. Now
the internet has once again burst the accepted bounds of community by allowing
and encouraging interactions between people who have never met. Many adults are
willing to reveal quite personal information about themselves and their ideal
partners on dating sites, and then to meet total strangers in hopes of romance.
Teens may also include
strangers in their private communities: about one-third of teens are Facebook
friends with people they have never met. Before the internet, this was
virtually impossible, except for long-distance pen pals who exchanged letters.
A right to privacy is
enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN in
1948: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy,
family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation.
Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference
or attacks.” The Supreme
Court has assumed a right to privacy in some of its most significant
decisions. But the intrusions on our privacy are subtle. Laws require companies
to tell us about how they treat our private information, but are not useful in
preventing them from ignoring our privacy unless we take definitive action.
For example, Amazon.com
tracks which books we look at on their site, and then reminds us the next time
we get on what we looked at. Like many of these systems which record what you
do on the internet, Amazon’s collection of data about the books you look at,
your browsing history, can be turned off by going into your account and
following this path: Your Amazon.com › Your Browsing History › Manage Your
Browsing History. Such systems are usually not easy to figure out and rarely
used.
Amazon’s surveillance of our
reading preferences and collection of very personal data might prove useful to
us, too. The ability to compile vast data banks offers us unprecedented opportunities
to connect or re-connect with people across the planet who would otherwise be
impossible to find. Facebook and similar sites link the living, allowing us to
find high school friends or long-lost relatives. Ancestry.com links past and
present: I have found census returns listing my great-grandparents and my
mother’s teenage occupation. We may be willing to give up privacy to gain
convenience. Traditional ideas about privacy may no longer be relevant.
Steve Hochstadt
Jacksonville IL
Published in the Jacksonville
Journal-Courier, May 28, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment