I just got a fund-raising
letter for Bar-Ilan University in Israel. It was sent by the American Friends
of Bar-Ilan University in New York, and exemplifies much about the relationship
of the United States and Israel. Non-profit organizations of all kinds in
Israel are significantly supported by Americans, just as the government of
Israel is significantly supported by our government. Privately and publically,
Americans, not only Jewish Americans, keep Israel going.
There are few similar
relationships between independent nations. Our so-called special relationship
with Great Britain, which developed over the entire 20th century, is
not nearly as special as our relationship with Israel, which just celebrated
its 65th birthday. The report “U.S. Foreign Aid to
Israel” of the Congressional Research Service begins by saying, “Israel is the
largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II.”
About one-third of the
American foreign-aid budget goes to Israel. Over the years 1949-1966, US government aid to Israel was the same as the total of US aid to all the countries of
Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Caribbean. The $3 billion
annually that the government gives to Israel accounts for about 20% of the
Israeli defense budget. In addition, Americans give about $1.5 billion
annually in private contributions.
Israel is not a poor nation.
Its gross domestic product per capita places it among the richest nations in the world,
similar to France and Japan. It ranks tenth in the world in percentage of its
population who are millionaires.
But philanthropy is not as highly developed in Israel as it is in the US. Hebrew
University professor Hillel Schmid found that
in 2009 Israeli philanthropy constituted 0.74 percent of Israel’s GDP, compared
to 2.1 percent in the United States. In that year, Israelis donated $3 billion,
only two times what Americans donated to Israel.
Until 2009, Israeli non-profits
received more money from abroad than they did from their own citizens.
Some of the funds that
Americans send to Israel effectively oppose American foreign policy. The NY
Times estimated that Americans donated about $200 million between 2000 and 2010
to Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. American
contributions to settlement outposts which are illegal under Israeli law are eligible for tax deductions under IRS rules.
The fund-raising letter notes
Bar-Ilan’s unique character: “It is the only seat of higher learning in
all of Israel that requires its students to complete a Judaic Studies
curriculum.” Since Israel was founded as a state for Jews, lies right in the
middle of a region where religion dominates public life, and is under permanent
siege because of religious conflicts with Muslims, it might be surprising that
its universities generally do not require religious instruction. Although
religious conservatives exert disproportionate influence on Israeli politics,
Israel is an outpost of secular Western values, such as the separation of
temple and state, in the Middle East. This may be a good argument for
supporting Israel, but does it mean that we should support Israel more than any
other nation on earth?
I raise the question, does
Israel need so much American aid? Does the economic development of Israel into
one of the world’s richest nations suggest a shift in the nature of the special
financial relationship between the US and Israel? Should wealthy Israelis
shoulder more of the burden of supporting their own nation?
These legitimate questions
are very difficult to discuss in our current political climate. Anyone advocating
a change in the American relationship to Israel is accused of abandoning Jews
to destruction by Hezbollah and other militant Muslim forces. Pointing out the
facts about this relationship can bring accusations of antisemitism.
I am not arguing that we should
reduce public or private aid to Israel, just providing some numbers. But these
numbers should make us think about how we distribute American taxpayers’ money
around the world, especially when we have enormous budget deficits. Does it
make sense for us to cut domestic programs which help the poor, while we give
so generously to a wealthy nation?
Steve Hochstadt
Jacksonville IL
Published in the Jacksonville
Journal-Courier, June 4, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment