Go shopping at the grocery
store. Order a burger or a taco. Buy clothes at the department store. Go about
your normal life.
There are no poor people. Or
just a few, as you drive by the homeless shelter, where a few people might be
smoking outside. Or you see someone in ragged clothes shuffling around
downtown. Maybe someone asks you for a quarter.
So there’s a few poor people,
but not many, not enough to make more than fleeting impressions on your day.
The newspaper doesn’t show
poor people, either. There’s no poor person explaining how they get along on
page 1, no reports on policies in Washington that take poor people seriously.
Poor people don’t make the sports or culture or society pages and are even unlikely
to appear in the obituaries, which cost money.
Students at prestigious
universities won’t see poor people in their classes. Most poor young Americans,
aged 19-22 and in the bottom 20% of incomes, are not
in college. Those who are don’t show up at the famous private
universities, where, for example, all our Supreme Court justices were educated.
Many of those schools enroll more students from the top 1% than from the bottom
60%.
But you have been surrounded
by poor people all day. More than 1 in every 8 Americans lives below the
poverty level, over 40
million Americans. The greeter at Walmart, the young woman taking
your food order, the shopper looking for day-old bread – they might all be
poor.
You just don’t know they are
poor. You don’t know about their struggles to put food on the table for their
families, about how poverty causes health problems, about how they choose
between paying rent and getting health insurance. You don’t see them buy
clothes at the thrift store, because you only ever go to the side entrance to
drop off things you don’t need. You don’t see them at the emergency room,
because you can schedule an appointment with a doctor and pay a quarter of what
an uninsured person would be charged. You only see their neighborhoods through
car windows and don’t have to think about how they got that way.
Adding to their invisibility,
the poor are more
concentrated in rural America than in cities. One-quarter of rural
American children live in poverty, somewhat more than the one-fifth of urban
children.
Poverty has many causes. Some
are personal choices, like drug use, while others are bad luck, such as an
accident. But the level of poverty in a nation is a consequence of political
choices. The United States has more poor people than all other countries with
similar economies, because of decades of political choices. More than 1% of
Americans, that’s over 4 million people, live on less than $1.90 a day. Among
the 10 countries with the highest per capita income in the world, the United
States has by far the highest proportion of very poor people, more
than twice as many.
Poverty is an inherent part
of the American economic system. Over the past 40 years, the American economy
has boomed, but the number of people living in poverty has grown steadily with
our population. The boom helped
the rich, not the poor. In that period, the incomes of the top 1%
doubled, while the incomes of the bottom fifth grew a total of 4%.
Conservatives have made
poverty into a liberal cause. Anyone could advocate for the poor, but
conservatives in America have chosen to blame the poor for their plight,
depicting the poor as venal, lazy spongers. Ronald Reagan picked out a singular
woman
con artist as a “welfare queen” to illustrate his view of everyone
who was on welfare. FOX News
regularly offers “evidence” that the poor live comfortably from welfare. Paul
Ryan compared the safety net to a “hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives
of dependency and complacency”.
Americans who are
conservative tend to blame
the poor for being poor. More than half of Republicans believe that
people are poor because of a lack of effort, true for only 19% of Democrats.
Poverty is more than twice as
likely for blacks, native Americans and Hispanics, than for whites. So white
Americans tend to greatly overestimate the connection between poverty and race,
which feeds into the conservative tendency to blame poor people, who are assumed
to be minorities, for their poverty.
Those attitudes explain
Republican efforts to cut holes in the safety net for the neediest Americans.
The Republican tax reform paid for huge cuts for the wealthy by reducing
health care funds for the poor.
It’s easy to ignore the poor,
to pretend there aren’t very many of them, that they get what they deserve,
that they have nothing to do with us. None of that is true. No child deserves
to get poor medical care or to have to miss meals every day. The poor do the
jobs we don’t want and their low wages mean we can afford more of what we don’t
need.
The poor don’t live off of us
– we live on them.
Steve Hochstadt
Springbrook WI
Published in the Jacksonville
Journal-Courier, September 25, 2018
When you say that “some are personal choices, like drug use” you seem to be falling into the human tendency to “blame the poor for being poor”. I agree that drug use often leads to poverty but I hope we could agree that addiction is a disease, not a choice.
ReplyDeleteDear Mr. Meece,
DeleteSome people are poor because they make poor choices. So yes, I do blame some poor people for their plight. Emphasis on “some”. Just because conservatives tend to blame “the poor” for being poor, doesn’t mean that it is correct to say the opposite, that structural circumstances are to blame for every instance of poverty.
I agree that addiction is a disease, but addiction does not explain all drug use.
I am trying to be careful with my words.
Thanks for your comment.
best wishes,
Steve Hochstadt
For the record, let me say that I found your article to be very well written on an important topic and yes, unfortunately, the poor are invisible to many. Thank you for shining some light in that direction.
ReplyDeleteUsing drug use as the example of poor choices just hit a personal sore spot. My daughter struggled with opiate addiction, with it's roots in medical treatment following neck surgery, for several years. A financial mess and borderline poverty are just two of the side effects of that addiction. Fortunately she is 18 months clean and attempting to rebuild her life. Unfortunately the stigma of being seen as a drug user is a difficult one to overcome when many see that usage as a personal choice. Yes, sometimes it is a choice but it seems to me that poverty would be more common with those dealing with addiction. Some scientific studies are beginning to show that addiction is a reaction within the brain that is beyond our conscious control. When does it begin, first pill, second or the 100th? Why does one user become addicted while the next user doesn't? I wish I knew but I felt compelled to shine my little light on the topic.
I will continue to read your posts and have expressed my displeasure to the Journal Courier for the decision to drop your and Mr. Jamison's columns.
Sincerely,
Larry Meece