Many Americans would like to
pay less in taxes. That desire is a major motivating force behind the Tea Party
revolt at the right end of the political spectrum. But I’m sure many liberals
would also like to have their tax burden reduced. In the interest of bringing
these two sides of our partisan political debates closer together, I propose
that everybody get behind the following three ways to reduce the tax burdens of
most Americans.
1. Do a better job of
collecting the taxes that Americans owe. Every year about $385
billion in tax revenues are not paid. During fiscal year 2013, the US
government collected $2.77 trillion
in tax revenues, meaning that about 12% of what should have been collected
wasn’t. Those uncollected taxes would considerably reduce the budget deficit
and the resulting federal debt.
Who doesn’t pay their taxes?
Most Americans would be easily caught if we cheated: our income is reported by
employers on W-2's. Joe Antenucci, professor of accounting and finance at
Youngstown State University, offers this profile of the typical
tax cheat: “male, under age 50 in a high tax bracket with a complex return.”
The most common method of cheating is to overstate church donations. But the
most profitable methods involve hiding big
incomes illegally. This year, Swiss bank Credit Suisse pleaded guilty to
helping wealthy Americans hide billions of dollars from US tax collectors in
foreign bank accounts, and will pay $2.6 billion in fines. Such methods are
only open to the wealthiest Americans.
How can we stop such cheating,
increase legal tax collections, and reduce the burden on the rest of us? Not by
decreasing the enforcement budget of the IRS. Cuts
in the IRS budget demanded by Congressional Republicans have reduced its
staff by about 8000 people over the past four years, and thus reduced its
ability to catch cheaters. As the IRS budget has dropped, so have the number of
audits. I have read many different estimates of how much new revenue each
additional dollar invested in IRS enforcement brings, ranging from $4 to $10.
But it’s clear that increasing the IRS enforcement budget decreases the deficit
and thus could contribute to lowering our tax rates.
2. Reduce some tax loopholes.
There is always discussion about “tax loopholes”, legal ways that people avoid
paying taxes. Congressional Republicans have recently talked about ending the
loophole that allows homeowners to deduct mortgage interest. That would
significantly increase the taxes paid by most middle-class Americans. But they
haven’t talked about ending some amazing loopholes that benefit only the very
wealthy. For example, in 1993 Congress passed legislation designed to prevent
corporations from deducting giant salaries for their executives as expenses.
But a loophole
in the law exempted so-called “performance pay”, including stock options. Over
the past 6 years, Walmart has claimed a deduction
for $298 million in “performance pay” for its eight top executives, reducing
its tax burden by $104 million. Multiply that by all the giant corporations
that employ this loophole, and the result is a lot of money that must be made
up by the rest of us.
Here’s another loophole. The
biggest American pharmacy chain, Walgreens,
is considering becoming the biggest Swiss pharmacy. If Walgreens, currently
located in Illinois, reincorporates in Switzerland, its tax rate would be
considerably reduced. In 2012, Illinois gave Walgreens $46 million in corporate
income tax credits in exchange for a pledge to stay here for 10 years. Walgreens
may not make the jump, but many other big US corporations have “moved” to tax
havens like Switzerland and Ireland. Profits from American consumers end up as
taxes elsewhere.
3. Make all income equal.
Unlike the great majority of ordinary taxpayers, people whose income consists
mainly of capital gains pay a much lower tax rate. Capital gains are taxed at
15%, or 20% for those who make above $400,000, while their rate for other
income is 39.6%. In 2011 it was reported that billionaire Warren Buffett paid
the lowest
tax rate of anyone in his office, including his receptionist. Nearly all of
the capital gains tax benefit goes to people with annual incomes over $1
million. Here’s the result: in 2007, the richest 400 households by income, who
each made over $340 million that year, paid the same tax rate as those earning
$50,000 to $75,000. The annual cost in tax revenues is about $40 billion.
We could have the same
governmental services that we have now and pay less taxes if just these three
changes were implemented. Or we could have somewhat more services (like better
roads), and still pay less. We might feel better, too, because all Americans
would be treated more equally.
What’s in the way? Each of
these changes would benefit only 90% or 95% or 99% of Americans. The extra
revenue from catching tax cheaters, from closing those loopholes, and from
treating all income equally would mostly come from the richest 1%. They are a
tiny minority, but they have the greatest influence. Their fellow millionaires
in the Senate and the House are easily persuaded by the trickle-down economic theories
which defend these tax breaks. Their personal connections to Congress through
big donations and their lobbying groups magnify their voices. That’s not going
to change unless the rest of us speak louder.
Steve Hochstadt
Jacksonville IL
Published in the Jacksonville
Journal-Courier, July 15, 2014
Interesting! It's true that a majority of Americans would like to pay less in taxes, as would majority of the world. It's not an issue that can pass through the senate so easily, even if proven to result with undeniably great feedback and outcome. However, the aforementioned steps you provided seem to only require tiny changes and development, which is good. After all, nobody wants to be bombarded with sudden change. In any case, thanks for sharing such a great read, Steve! Kudos and all the best to you!
ReplyDeleteWanda Hanson @ Tax Tiger
Those are some very good tips on how to reduce tax burdens. Doing tax alone is already quite frustrating, and knowing that you might encounter a bigger problem in the future because of it can be very stressful. Anyway, thank you for sharing this with us, Steve. I hope a lot of people could make use of your tips.
ReplyDeleteTracy Frazier @ Sunnen Law
Intuit merchant services phone number for accounting help
ReplyDelete