Headlines scream of crisis.
Russia Invades Ukraine! A New Cold War!
Ukraine is experiencing its
third revolution since 1991, throwing eastern Europe into turmoil. Russian troops
have invaded a European neighbor for the first time since 1968 in
Czechoslovakia. How should we understand this new flashpoint of international
conflict?
The lands of current Ukraine
have been fought over for centuries among Poles, Lithuanians and Russians.
Passionate Ukrainians look back to the Cossack Hetmanate
established in 1649 as a historical precursor of their current state. Within a
few years, the Hetmanate became subservient to the Russian Tsar. It did not
include the Crimea, nor Ukraine’s current eastern districts.
Crimea has a completely
different history. Italians
briefly controlled the peninsula in the 13th century, which eventually became part
of the Turkish Ottoman empire. The Romanov Empire first conquered the Crimea
in 1783, and kept it administratively separate from Ukrainian regions.
After the Revolution swept
away the Tsarist empire in February 1917, Ukrainian
revolutionaries tried to create a separate socialist state. The victory of
the Red Army led by Leon Trotsky meant the end of Ukrainian dreams of
independence, although the young Soviet state, under Lenin and through the late
1920s, allowed Ukraine unprecedented autonomy, especially in language and
culture. Crimea was not part of the newly formed Ukrainian
SSR.
Ukraine suffered as much as
any part of the Soviet Union for the next three decades. A famine in 1921
caused by seven years of war left hundreds of thousands dead. Under Joseph
Stalin’s perversion of Russian revolutionary aims, agricultural
collectivization followed by agricultural robbery after 1928 created another
famine, this time consciously directed at Ukraine and Ukrainians who resisted
Stalin’s forcible Russianization of Ukraine. No region of Europe was more
devastated by the Nazi occupation than the bloodlands of eastern Europe. Over 5
million Ukrainians died during the war, at least one of every eight people.
Nearly one third were homeless because of Nazi policy of wholesale destruction
in retreat: 700 cities and town were destroyed and 28,000 villages. In none of
this Ukrainian history did Crimea play any role.
Only in 1954 was Crimea
attached to Ukraine, at that time a meaningless administrative move, since all
decisions were still made in Moscow. About two-thirds of the Crimean
population was ethnically Russian.
The argument over who should
rule Ukraine was apparent at the moment when the Soviet Union dissolved in
1991. That August, the Ukrainian parliament adopted the Act of Declaration of
Independence of Ukraine. A national
referendum in December on independence was passed by 92% of voters. In
western Ukraine, under 4% voted against independence, but this percentage rose
to 10-13% in the far eastern districts. In the Crimea, on the other hand, 42%
voted no. Only a slim
majority of ethnic Russians, who are concentrated in the east and especially
in Crimea, favored independence, 55% to 45%. Thus Ukrainians in Kiev, as
opposed to Russians in Moscow, have ruled Crimea only since 1991.
Since 1991 Ukraine has
whipsawed between pro-Western and pro-Russian leadership. Viktor Yanukovych,
the pro-Russian, won rigged elections in 2004, was deposed by the popular
Orange Revolution, and then reelected narrowly in 2010. Popular protests over
the past four months against Yanukovych’s pro-Russian policies again forced him
out in favor of a pro-Western government.
Russian reaction to this
defeat of their man in Ukraine has focused on taking control of Crimea. Over
the past week, official and unofficial Russian military forces have occupied
Crimea. This coming weekend a referendum on Crimean “autonomy” is scheduled.
Over the past 5 years Ukrainian popular
sentiment has been gradually moving further away from Russia: in 2008-9,
over 20% said that the two nations should unite; last month it was only 12%.
Such sentiments came mainly from older people: 17% of those 55 and over, but
only 5% under 30. About 32% of ethnic Russians wanted one unified state, but
only 9% of Ukrainians. In the Crimea, however, 41% wanted one state.
The military crisis in Crimea
is the latest chapter in centuries of Russian efforts to control the Black Sea.
The potential loss of their naval bases in Crimea if Ukraine turns away from
its close relationship with Russia would be major blow to Russian military
power. Russia might go to war if any Western power tried to put a navy in the
Black Sea.
Maintaining Ukrainian control
over Crimea would provide Russia with a constant justification for intervening
in Ukrainian affairs and a constant threat of military action. The Ukrainians
have a formidable job ahead of them: to remake their political system and
economy so that they can follow the path of the other eastern European states,
like Poland,
which has tripled its economy since it became free of Soviet control in 1989.
I am not suggesting a policy
of appeasement toward Russia aggression in Crimea. But the US will never fight
for Ukraine’s control over Crimea, and neither will any of our European allies.
The shift of Ukraine’s perspective from east to west, the uncoupling of Ukraine
from Russia for the first time in centuries, would be a major blow to Russian
power and prestige. Let us focus on that, an opportunity created for themselves
by the Ukrainian people. If the loss of Crimea is the price for Ukrainian
independence from Russia, that would be well worth paying.
Steve Hochstadt
Jacksonville IL
Published in the Jacksonville
Journal-Courier, March 11, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment